Search on our site

Commissioning time is minimal and lacks standardization One of the biggest challenges at the start of a construction project is allocating enough time for testing and verification at the end. This is crucial to ensure the project achieves the right quality, on time, and within budget. Scheduling during the programming phase is necessary. If not, it becomes almost impossible to have sufficient time for testing later. As a former project manager for electrical systems, I wonder why testing time is minimal and lacks standardization. Throughout my career, I have been involved in various stages of projects and taken part in multiple interest groups to integrate and optimize interdisciplinary processes. This experience has made me wiser, and I wish to share my insights with you. “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results” Albert Einstein In the initial stages of a project, the builder has a vision for the building. They know its intended use and the requirements it must meet. During the conceptual phase, funding is typically based on parallels with comparable projects. Next comes the programming phase, typically led by an architect to identify the needs of the owner and users. Workshops help define room types and their proximities. Each technical system specifies quality, capacity, and functionality. During the schematic design phase, the building's layout begins to take shape, and spaces are allocated for technical rooms and main pathways. Up to this point, projects are quite similar, with no specific assumptions made for technical systems. All disciplines are creating detailed drawings during the construction design phase to show system components. Often, this is when we start defining the setup of systems, as specialists like automation, access control, fire alarms, electrical, and HVAC are involved. By now, the project's initial stages may have stretched over time without adjusting the final deadline. The responsibility for testing time allocation shifts from the builder to the main contractor. Each discipline begins designing their technical system, forming a structure based on known or cost-effective products. Time is tight, and resources work hard to balance schedules. The focus is on quick design to start construction, with little thought for a testing phase—planning for it can wait. As you might guess, this is becoming Albert Einsteins definitions of Insanity. Is it not the same we did in the last project? “We tend to avoid tasks and systems when we don’t understand the how and why” Ove Kjærgård Yes, I did quote myself. I really do believe that the reason very highly competent people do not do parts of their work is because they do not understand how to make this plan or why they need to do it this early. I will share with you my thoughts, which I keep in mind when you plan for technical systems. Handover First, to make clear, does the owner require the building(s) to be handed over at the same time? It is also necessary to inquire about the sections and floors of the building. This outlines the main milestones of our pull plan. Resources Even though the owner only has one handover date, it can still be beneficial to divide, due to the amount of available key resources within each discipline and we already know that there are less resources for programming building automation systems than the electrician can provide to connect the components. System buildup How you divide the systems within the buildings, floors, and sections will impact your plan. For a 6-story building with one air handling unit, all construction work by different disciplines needs to be completed and the building cleaned before balancing the air distribution system. This can significantly influence the building's timeline. Alternatively, if there is one unit on each floor, then each floor can plan independently. Do you put all your automation gear for room and light control on the same switch panel board as the power outlets? Then the requirement will in different countries require you to complete the verification of the installation connected to this switchboard before power goes on. This way the project must wait unnecessary for the electrician. If you build a separate switchboard for room control and light control, the electrician can prioritize this first and the power outlets next. In this way programming and testing of room and light control can start earlier. All technical risers must have dampers, valves, heat exchangers, bus gateways, switchboard on each floor for example to do this work. Certain technical systems allow for programming to be completed prior to field deployment, whereas others require connection and calibration in the field before programming can commence. For critical systems and government building owners it is also widespread practice to make functional performance testing at the factory before shipping to the site. How you build up your systems affects various aspects of how soon you can start with the testing. Sample testing Certain owners mandate that all discipline formally commission their delivery of technical systems. While other owners simply stipulate that everything must function properly upon completion, entrusting the contractor with responsibility. And there is a thing in between, called sample testing. All components in a 10% sample group must meet the acceptance criteria. If any fails, a new 10% sample excluding the first group of components must be assessed by the contractor. If the second sample fails, all components within the system must be evaluated. As you understand, verifying 100% takes more time than verifying 10%. Only requiring 10% might reduce time but I also include a risk for quality and handover date. Order of tasks 1. Technical rooms and boundary connections to district supply. Program and verify components before connecting to the first floor. 2. Routings between technical rooms. Must be in place before each technical room has requirements for supply. This includes the riser for heating to be ready with water to connect one floor by the other. 3. Technical distributions to the overall areas on each floor. Prioritize the elements that need programing over passive components. Doing this in a different order will result in less time for testing or delayed handover. Milestones Without strong motivation and consequences, milestones will not be achieved on time. All dates but handovers will slide, the time left for testing will almost disappear. Time, quality, and cost will be equal only at the start of the project. Later than this you will always have to choose. If you choose time, it costs more and reduces quality. Standardization impossible? We should allocate ample time for testing early in the project. Although estimating the exact time needed can be challenging, making bold estimates during the programming phase can be based on similar projects. A Commissioning Provider, also known as ITB in Norway, can provide invaluable insights. Decisions made throughout the project will continually adjust this time allocation, considering new solutions or budget constraints. Management will face a critical decision: invest more in system construction or accept an extra month with increased risk to save money. Standardizing time is impossible if we don't standardize system buildup. I would love to hear your thoughts on this. How do you estimate testing time early in your projects? What are the biggest challenges you face? Share your comments below and let's start a great discussion!

We can’t find the page you’re looking for This page doesn’t exist. Go to Home and keep exploring. Go to Home

You don't have permissions to access this page. Back to site Switch Account

BCx Tips | Empower Through Shared Knowledge At BCx Tips, we gather global insights through comprehensive surveys and share valuable Building Commissioning experiences from every project stage. Our meticulously curated content is available for a small fee per topic, ensuring you gain access to systematic, expert knowledge that can enhance your projects. By sharing our experiences, we can collectively grow and exchange insights about the processes and systems related to the commissioning of construction projects. This is facilitated through structured surveys, where you can access the submitted responses. Help us spread the word to new users, as you gain access to more information each time someone shares their experience on a specific topic. Unlock Expert Building Commissioning Insights with BCx Tips At BCx Tips, we gather global insights through comprehensive surveys and share valuable Building Commissioning experiences from every project stage. Our meticulously curated content is available for a small fee per topic, ensuring you gain access to systematic, expert knowledge that can enhance your projects. Experience highlights All programs Protection Earth Instrument Earth Lightning protection Cathodic protection Elevator Escalator Travelator Smoke exhaust fireman's lift Heating DX Airconditioning heat exchanger heat pump cooling plant Fan coil AC Access Key and card Gates Opening control Perimeter Doors Security PA system AV system Speaker LED-screen Projector Display Audio utilities boundary point data network telephone paging hearing loop WIFI PoE AVoIP HDbaseT Safety lighting Emergency lighting daylight systems DALI Fixture LED Circadian lighting DMX Power supply Power distribution Transformer Energy storage Emergency power Back-up power Switchboard Distribution panel Firefighting system extinguishing Sprinkler Gas extinguishing Fire hose Foam Natural ventilation Opening control system Light well Climate windows Weather station Fire alarm system Fire protection system Smoke hatch Fire damper Smoke damper Fire curtain Smoke curtain Automation system Monitoring and control system Meter system Weather station system BMS BAS Building automation systems Building management system Energy Management system Cooling Door Access control Fire Alarm UPS Network Main switchboard Air handling units Ventilation supply system Air distribution system ventilation unit air system supply air system smoke extraction system fire ventilation fresh air system Hybrid ventilation Free examples of experience sharing from building commissioning 2 Participants 3 Plans Available Vis informasjon Building Automation, Building management systems and Energy management system 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Firefighting system like Sprinkler, foam and gas extinguishing 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Fire alarm and fire protection systems 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Ventilation supply and air distribution 1 Participant 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Solar screening system and weather station 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Warning system like patient warning or inmate breathing warning systems 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Intrusion alarm and video surveillance system 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Water supply and distribution systems, and solid outflow system 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Earthing, Lightning and Cathodic protection system 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Passenger and goods transportation system, elevator, escalator, travellator 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Heating, cooling and combined heating and cooling system 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Access monitor and control system for doors and gates Full experience access Vis informasjon Audio-video system 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Signal supply and distribution systems like network and antenna systems 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Lighting and emergency lighting systems 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Power supply and distribution system, Transformer, Generator, UPS and Energy storage system 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon Opening control systems, Light well, Smoke hatch and Climate windows 2 Plans Available Vis informasjon All Experiences Share your experience By sharing our experiences, we can collectively grow and exchange insights about the processes and systems related to the commissioning of construction projects. This is facilitated through structured surveys, where you can access the submitted responses. Help us spread the word to new users, as you gain access to more information each time someone shares their experience on a specific topic. Share Experience Proactive Strategies for Commissioning in Construction Projects We tend to avoid tasks and systems when we don’t understand the how and why Site facts 3 Subscribers 18 Experience topics 5 Site members 18 Submitted Experiences 2 Country contributed Join the Club Join our email list and get access to specials deals exclusive to our subscribers. Enter your email here Sign Up Thanks for submitting!